Userfocus

UX newsletter — November 2019

Improve your insight

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Message from the Editor

Somebody asked me recently if the discipline of user experience will fade away. They argued that technology will become so sophisticated that today's UX problems will disappear. My response is that we'll see more, not less, demand for UX expertise in the future. History shows that product teams push out technologies before they are ready for prime time. These technologies work when the omens line up and the wind is blowing in the right direction. But problems arise when the user's context doesn't match the product team's expectations. The user's internet connection is patchy. Or their screen is too small. Or their accent is hard for the system to understand. If we could fast forward 30 years, we may well have solved most of the UX problems created by today's technology. But tomorrow's technology will bring a new set of problems for us to solve.

This month's article is about common traps in user needs research. I hope you find it useful.

— David Travis


Common traps in user needs research and how to avoid them

Whether you call it a field visit, a contextual inquiry or a customer discovery interview, the goal of early stage research is the same: to uncover users' needs. Here are 5 mistakes I've seen crop up time and again in this kind of research. Read the article in full: Common traps in user needs research and how to fix them.


From our archives: 10 diagrams to help you think straight about UX Research

Some of the problems we work on as UX researchers are simple and are easily solved by getting users in front of our product. But other problems can be complex and it's hard to know how to start solving them. In situations like that, a simple 2x2 diagram can cut through the 'what ifs', the 'how abouts' and the edge cases and provide a simple way of looking at the problem. Here are 10 examples of 2x2 diagrams to simplify UX research discussions. Read the article in full: 10 diagrams to help you think straight about UX Research.


What we’re reading

Some interesting UX-related articles that got my attention over the last month:

  • Blade Runner: How well did the film predict 2019's tech?
  • I was surprised to discover that colouring the response scales of a questionnaire item (red for negative ratings, green for positive) causes only a small change in responses. 
  • The 5 mistakes teams make when running a pre-mortem. [PDF].
  • Today's entry in the interface Hall of Shame: Outdoors GPS.
  • Templates to get you started with usability testing.
  • Rules of Effective UX Writing.

Like these? Want more? View more posts on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.


The UX Tea Break

Some videos I published on YouTube last month:

  • UX research v Market research
  • On satisfaction surveys
  • Note taking in usability tests
  • Surveys—Bad or just dangerous?

Like these? Want more? Subscribe to my YouTube channel.


Upcoming UX training courses

Foundation Certificate in User Experience, Jan 21-23 2020, London.

In this fun and hands-on training course, you'll practice all the key areas of UX — from interviewing your users through to prototyping and usability testing your designs — while you prepare for and take the BCS Foundation Certificate exam. View the full syllabus: Foundation Certificate in User Experience.


UX quotation of the month

"Never delegate understanding." — Charles Eames.


Did I mention I've published a book?

It's titled Think Like a UX Researcher. Grab your copy here.


Hungry for more?

Read previous newsletters.


Want to receive your own copy of this newsletter?

Join our community of people interested in user experience. Sent monthly. No spam.