We’ve known for some time that usability improvements can have a massive effect on the bottom line, so what stops usability professionals from actually measuring the return on investment of their work?
Is it because they think the benefit of a usability-induced change is obvious, so there’s no need to measure anything?
If so, then they’re taking a risk. The development team is unlikely to share their vision of "obviousness". The project manager may push back, claiming that the change is too difficult to implement, that it will need to wait for the next release, or that “user satisfaction” isn’t as important as selling more product.
Or is it that they can’t be bothered — perhaps because return on investment calculations aren’t the only way to sell usability to your manager.
Again, they are missing an opportunity. There is something uniquely persuasive about being able to prove that a design change can make or save the company money — especially in the current economic climate.
Or is it simply because people think the computations are too difficult?
In fact, using 2 common measures from usability tests, the calculations are easy enough to do with a paper and pencil.
When a 5% improvement in completion rate is worth £7 million
Success rate is the most important usability measure with an e-commerce site: how many users can complete the task?
Let’s say you carry out a large sample, benchmark usability test of an e-commerce web site. You find that 70% of your sample manages to complete the task successfully.
By making design changes to the web site, we should be able to improve this figure. Usability improvements invariably have a dramatic effect on improving success rates, but for argument’s sake, let’s assume we can improve the success rate by a measly 5%, making the new success rate 75%. Most usability professionals would bet their house that they could make at least that improvement.
How much is that 5% improvement worth?
We can do a simple calculation using this equation:
Sales = Success Rate x Potential Sales
“Sales” is the actual turnover of the e-commerce site. “Success Rate” is the figure we’re about to improve. “Potential Sales” is the amount of sales we would make if every user could complete the task.
At this point, we need to know the sales of the e-commerce site. Let’s assume it’s £100m per annum. (For most serious e-commerce outfits, this is a conservative figure. A high street store like John Lewis in Oxford Street takes £100 million per week. And Jared Spool describes a design change to an e-commerce site that was worth $300m per annum).
So at the moment, 70% of people manage to checkout and the sales figure is £100m. In other words:
- £100,000,000 = 70% x Potential Sales
The Potential Sales is therefore £100,000,000/70% = £142,857,142.
We think we can increase the success rate to 75%, so:
- Sales = Success Rate x Potential Sales
- Sales = 75% x £142,857,142
Which comes to £107,142,857. The difference between this figure and our original £100m is over £7m. This is how much our 5% improvement in success rate is worth.
When improving time on task by 15 seconds is worth £1.3 million
An important measure for an intranet is time on task: how long do people take to complete a task?
A good example for an intranet would be looking up a colleague in the phone book. This is something that most intranet users do most days, often more than once per day. What would be the cost savings of reducing the amount of time people spent on this task?
Let’s assume that we’ve measured the time it takes an employee to find someone’s email address in the Intranet address book and begin an email message with that person’s name in the “To:” field. Assume it takes 60 seconds. We reckon we can reduce the time on task to 45 seconds by displaying a clickable email address alongside the employee’s name in the search results.
What’s the financial benefit of 15 seconds?
To do this calculation properly, we need to know how many times per day people carry out this task. Let’s make the conservative assumption that people do this task once per working day on average. If your organisation employs 100,000 people that do this task and the average loaded salary is £15/hour (again, a conservative figure), we can calculate that:
- Current time on task = 45 seconds = 45/60 minutes = 45 / (60 x 60) hours = 0.0125 hours
- Daily cost of task per employee = 0.0125 hours x £15/hour = £0.1875
- Daily cost of task for all employees = £0.1875 x 100,000 employees = £18,750
- Most people work an average of 220 days per year, so the yearly cost is = £18,750 x 220 days = £4,125,000.
Now let’s work out what the cost would be if we reduced the time from 45 seconds to 30 seconds. Working through the same calculations as above, we get:
- New time on task = 30 seconds = 30/60 minutes = 30 / (60 x 60) hours = 0.0083 hours
- Daily cost of task per employee = 0.0083 hours x £15 = £0.125
- Daily cost of task for all employees = £0.125 x 100,000 employees = £12,500
- The new yearly cost is = £12,500 x 220 days = £2,750,000.
The difference between the before and after figures is over £1.3 million. Not bad for a day’s work.
The easy way to make sure design changes happen
These kinds of calculation are very simple to make, so long as you have the kind of robust usability measures you get from a well-executed, large sample usability test. But when computing your own numbers, here's the golden rule: err on the conservative side. So for example, if you’re not sure if all employees use the Intranet phone book, reduce the number of users to a more persuasive value.
The fact is that virtually any improvement in usability will have a knock-on improvement in your organisation’s bottom line — but to make sure your voice is heard, you’ll need to collect the data and crunch the numbers.
About the author
Dr. David Travis (@userfocus on Twitter) holds a BSc and a PhD in Psychology and he is a Chartered Psychologist. He has worked in the fields of human factors, usability and user experience since 1989 and has published two books on usability. David helps both large firms and start ups connect with their customers and bring business ideas to market. If you like his articles, you'll love his online user experience training course.
Foundation Certificate in UX
Gain hands-on practice in all the key areas of UX while you prepare for the BCS Foundation Certificate in User Experience. More details
Every month, we share an in-depth article on user experience with over 10,000 newsletter readers. Want in? Sign up now and download a free guide to usability test moderation.
If you liked this, try
Trying to embed usability in an organisation needs more than persuasive, logical arguments. You also need to appeal to managers' emotions and political ambitions. This article describes five successful strategies that we've seen work in companies large and small. Institutionalising Usability: 5 Ways to embed usability in your company.
User Experience Articles
Our most recent articles
- Apr 3: Is Usability a Science?
- Mar 6: Why iterative design isn’t enough to create innovative products
- Feb 6: The Beginners' Guide to Contextual Interviewing
- Jan 9: The 8 competencies of user experience: a tool for assessing and developing UX Practitioners
- Dec 5: Non-UX books that every UX practitioner should read
Our most commented articles
Search for articles by keyword
- 7 articles tagged accessibility
- 4 articles tagged axure
- 5 articles tagged benefits
- 16 articles tagged careers
- 8 articles tagged case study
- 1 article tagged css
- 8 articles tagged discount usability
- 2 articles tagged ecommerce
- 14 articles tagged ethnography
- 14 articles tagged expert review
- 1 article tagged fitts law
- 4 articles tagged focus groups
- 1 article tagged forms
- 6 articles tagged guidelines
- 10 articles tagged heuristic evaluation
- 7 articles tagged ia
- 14 articles tagged iso 9241
- 11 articles tagged iterative design
- 3 articles tagged layout
- 2 articles tagged legal
- 11 articles tagged metrics
- 3 articles tagged mobile
- 7 articles tagged moderating
- 3 articles tagged morae
- 2 articles tagged navigation
- 9 articles tagged personas
- 15 articles tagged prototyping
- 7 articles tagged questionnaires
- 1 article tagged quotations
- 4 articles tagged roi
- 16 articles tagged selling usability
- 12 articles tagged standards
- 44 articles tagged strategy
- 2 articles tagged style guide
- 4 articles tagged survey design
- 5 articles tagged task scenarios
- 2 articles tagged templates
- 21 articles tagged tools
- 53 articles tagged usability testing
- 3 articles tagged user manual